Note that the person marked on the verb in (4a) is of the A, while he is in (4b) of the P. If the A or P is marked on the verb, it depends on which one is highest in the hierarchy of people 1 > 2 > 3. If the upper argument is a P and not an A, the verb appears with a special marker, h, in (4b), called the inverse marker. Another characteristic is the concordance in participations that have different forms for different sexes: the subject-verb agreement the attraction effects are studied in Armenian. Previous studies have shown that distinguishing between lowercase and lowercase on substantive sentences reduces the pull effects in production, i.e. the tendency to produce a verb that corresponds to a non-substjecary subject. An important outstanding question is whether the attraction effects are modulated by case information in sentence comprehension. To replay this question, we conducted three attraction experiments in Armenian, a language with a rich and productive case system. The experiments showed obvious pull effects and also showed a general role in case tagging, so participants showed faster reaction and reading times when names had different cases in the sentence. However, we found little evidence that distinctive case marking modulated the attraction effects. We present a theoretical proposal on how case and figure information can be used differently to understand during the contractual license.

In general, this work sheds light on the nature of the call notices used for the conclusion of morphosyntact dependencies. There is no indication that the marking of the case mitigates the effects of attraction. Most Slavic languages are very volatile, with the exception of Bulgarian and Macedonian. The correspondence is similar to Latin, for example between adjectives and nouns in gender, number, uppercase and lowercase (if counted as a separate category). The following examples come from Serbo-Croatian: concordance usually involves the concordance of the value of a grammatical category between different elements of a sentence (or sometimes between sentences, as in some cases where a pronoun is needed to match its predecessor or speaker). Some categories that often trigger grammatical concordance are listed below. At the beginning of English, there was concordance for the second person singular of all verbs in the present tense, as well as in the past of some common verbs. It was usually in the form -est, but -st and t also occurred. Note that this does not affect terminations for other people and numbers. The very irregular verb to be is the only verb with more coherence than this one in the present tense.

We see that word marks are widespread and widespread in all languages. In fact, only about one-fifth of the languages in the sample lack any form of verbal marking; These languages are mostly available in West Africa, the Caucasus, as well as South and Southeast Asia. The absence of verbal marking is particularly rare in North America and New Guinea. Of the languages that manifest verbal marking, about two-thirds indicate the mark of the two transitive arguments, A and P. It is the dominant model of people`s conformity in all areas except Eurasia. It is particularly common in North America, New Guinea and Australia. In languages where only one of the arguments of a transitive clause is marked, this argument is typically the A (25%) and not the P (7%). Verbal marking of the single A is the most common in Eurasia….